


I cannot agree with people saying that Jonathan Glazer proved those who say it's impossible to adapt the novel wrong. There are some books that are unfilmable and Under the Skin is most definitely one of them. So what happens is I read the book, I love it and then I see the movie. The main reason I usually do is because there is a movie in the works based on the novel and it sounds amazing. Since I don't have much time to read fiction, I don't spend my time with books that often. It's been a year, more or less, since I read Michel Faber's terrific novel Under the Skin.

Unfortunately, since I am familiar with book material there's going to be a lot of 'oh, what could have been!' talk here. Let me preface this by saying that I did like the movie a lot.
